| Subject: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 9 Dec 2009 08:15:45 +1100 |
What's more embarassing Chuck - bein' iggerent or bein' a redneck? :-) Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 09/12/2009, at 1:53 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > Well, I've never considered it such but Wiki tells me I'm wrong. > "Shoot, redneck term for shit or damn." -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Pee bags, was Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Sue Pearce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Andrew Fildes |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Chuck Norcutt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Chuck Norcutt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |