Subject: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot |
---|---|
From: | Russ Butler <rbinnj@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:07:36 -0500 |
Oops. You're right of course. My only defense is that "shoot" is used so frequently here in the US that I forgot that it IS a substitute for sh*t. Piers Hemy wrote: > "Well, shoot, who would've thought of that" is a usage I have heard many a > time from your countrymen, Russ. > > Piers -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Joel Wilcox |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Joel Wilcox |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |