Subject: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot |
---|---|
From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:06:17 +1100 |
Hmmm...perhaps I should have said that point and shoot photographers produce excrement? Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 09/12/2009, at 8:55 PM, Moose wrote: > Andrew Fildes wrote: >> Exactly - point and shoot cameras produce excrement! > > Case Resting Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Ellipsis, was: Speaking of paradigms, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |