Subject: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot |
---|---|
From: | Joel Wilcox <jfwilcox@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 8 Dec 2009 08:06:55 -0600 |
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > "Well, shoot, who would've thought of that" is a usage I have heard many a > time from your countrymen, Russ. I suppose it's a euphemism, like "heck" "darn" etc. Never used for the real thing though. Joel W. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Charles Geilfuss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Russ Butler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Piers Hemy |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Dunnies - was Nathan's PAW 48: point and shoot, Russ Butler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |