Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh

[Wayne Harridge]

I think it's easier to switch lenses (providing you have that lens).

...Wayne

Wayne Harridge
http://lrh.structuregraphs.com/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chuck Norcutt []
> Sent: Thursday, 7 May 2009 8:36 PM
> To: Olympus Camera Discussion
> Subject: Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh
> 
> I tried various blur techniques.  Applying a "radial blur" in the
> direction of the stem or a "smart blur" with a small radius works
> fairly
> well.  Of course, you have to mask it so just the offending leaves are
> affected.  But to merge the "double image" effect you have to use
> enough
> blurring that the leaves begin to lose their identity as leaves.  If I
> cared enough to really recover this image I would probably (under very
> high magnification) "paint" in the gap with the clone tool or use a
> similar technique that blended the "double image" without softening the
> sharper outer edges of the leaves.  But too much work for something
> that's not mine.  :-)
> 
> Chuck Norcutt
> 
> SwissPace wrote:
> > I don't know how to do it in practice but couldn't you apply some
> > gaussian blur to that section.
> >
> >
> >> OK, I see it now.  I won't attempt to fix that.
> >>
> >>
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/