Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh

[Chuck Norcutt]

OK, I see it now.  I won't attempt to fix that.

Chuck Norcutt

C.H.Ling wrote:
> No, I use sRGB always.
> 
> BTW, the bad bokeh is seen on the lower part of the image where there are 
> some closer leaves/branches. I call it double image which looks like seeing 
> things with astigmatic eyes.
> 
> C.H.Ling
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Chuck Norcutt"
> 
>> I opened it in PhotoShop and it was stored in sRGB.  AFAIK there is no
>> profile associated with the original image and PhotoShop issued no
>> message about changing color profiles.  Perhaps it was Adobe RGB to
>> begin with?  But I guess CH will have to advise on that one.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Ken Norton wrote:
>>> Dr. Edit wrote:
>>>
>>>> I just noticed that, in a side-by-side comparison, my modified version
>>>> seems to have a bit more contrast and saturation than CH's original.  I
>>>> don't understand why since I altered nothing except cloning out the
>>>> orange and adding a black border for display.  The only other thing I
>>>> can think of is re-saving as a JPEG twice but I don't know why that
>>>> would change contrast or saturation.
>>>>
>>> What program did you do the edit in?  Chances are when you opened the 
>>> file
>>> for editing you changed the colorspace or the perceptual assignment. Then
>>> when you saved, it saved using the new parameters.
>>>
>>> AG
>> -- 
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
>> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
>> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>>
>>
> 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/