Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh

[C.H.Ling]

No, I use sRGB always.

BTW, the bad bokeh is seen on the lower part of the image where there are 
some closer leaves/branches. I call it double image which looks like seeing 
things with astigmatic eyes.

C.H.Ling

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Chuck Norcutt"

>I opened it in PhotoShop and it was stored in sRGB.  AFAIK there is no
> profile associated with the original image and PhotoShop issued no
> message about changing color profiles.  Perhaps it was Adobe RGB to
> begin with?  But I guess CH will have to advise on that one.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Ken Norton wrote:
>> Dr. Edit wrote:
>>
>>> I just noticed that, in a side-by-side comparison, my modified version
>>> seems to have a bit more contrast and saturation than CH's original.  I
>>> don't understand why since I altered nothing except cloning out the
>>> orange and adding a black border for display.  The only other thing I
>>> can think of is re-saving as a JPEG twice but I don't know why that
>>> would change contrast or saturation.
>>>
>>
>> What program did you do the edit in?  Chances are when you opened the 
>> file
>> for editing you changed the colorspace or the perceptual assignment. Then
>> when you saved, it saved using the new parameters.
>>
>> AG
> -- 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
> 

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/