The 90/2.0 was "OK"?
"OK" ?!?!?!?!
The 90/2.0 is magical... mystical... übersmoothicalicious bokeh...
Really, I have come to agree with Moose that it's really not the world's
best lens at Macro magnifications, it is clearly optimised for
near-macro. But in terms of smoothness, with near perfect bokeh
(I have never managed to coax hard-edged out-of-focus highlights out
of mine, always smooth gaussian-blurred circles) I find the bokeh of
this lens impeccable.
I have a back-log of about 200 photos with this lens to print in the
darkroom,
but with each one I get a better idea of its character. Complex
optical design
or not, it's bokeh is wonderful.
As mentioned in my previous mail, not an EF 85/1.2L, no, but closer
than anything
else I've seen.
:-)
On 06 May 2009, at 3:51 PM, C.H.Ling wrote:
> the 90/2 was ok.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|