>
> Dude, if you're not referring to the bokeh of a Zuiko 90/2.0 Macro, or a
> Canon EF 50/1.2L or 85/1.2L, it's *not* bokeh... Nothing compares.
>
I've not been so blessed with any of those lenses. But, it is true the 90/2
has that magical quality. In fact, the bokeh and DoF is probably reasonably
close. Most of those 300/4.5 shots were taken at F8 whereas, the 90/2 would
have been a bit wider-open.
Maybe.
The wind was blowing them around, and the reason why I was using F8 had less
to do with DoF (although, I'm pleased with the results) and more to do with
fudge-factor.
> P.S. Just kidding, the 300/4.5 is wonderful
For some odd reason, the 300/4.5 produces images that make you think it's an
F2.8 lens. I've personally never encountered another lens like it.
Not bad for a cast-off, eh?
AG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|