Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh

[Fernando Gonzalez Gentile]

Indeed. Saturation increase is more noticeable than contrast increase, 
but the yellow centre shows as if a LCE would have been applied.
Will do the same after I finish working to see what I get. Perhaps I'd 
convert it to .tif, clone out and them back to .jpg. Have seen that in 
my workflow, while resizing and changing from 16 to 8 bit give different 
results if I resize o change color depth first.

Fernando

Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> I just noticed that, in a side-by-side comparison, my modified version 
> seems to have a bit more contrast and saturation than CH's original.  I 
> don't understand why since I altered nothing except cloning out the 
> orange and adding a black border for display.  The only other thing I 
> can think of is re-saving as a JPEG twice but I don't know why that 
> would change contrast or saturation.
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>   
>> So, I thought I'd show you what I meant.  This is CH's flower sans the 
>> pesky orange in the background.
>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/temp/CH%20Ling%20flower>
>> This is his original
>> <http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2166.JPG>
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>     


-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/