Nope, no LCE. The only editing tool applied was the cloning tool.
Chuck Norcutt
Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
> Indeed. Saturation increase is more noticeable than contrast increase,
> but the yellow centre shows as if a LCE would have been applied.
> Will do the same after I finish working to see what I get. Perhaps I'd
> convert it to .tif, clone out and them back to .jpg. Have seen that in
> my workflow, while resizing and changing from 16 to 8 bit give different
> results if I resize o change color depth first.
>
> Fernando
>
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>> I just noticed that, in a side-by-side comparison, my modified version
>> seems to have a bit more contrast and saturation than CH's original. I
>> don't understand why since I altered nothing except cloning out the
>> orange and adding a black border for display. The only other thing I
>> can think of is re-saving as a JPEG twice but I don't know why that
>> would change contrast or saturation.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>>
>>> So, I thought I'd show you what I meant. This is CH's flower sans the
>>> pesky orange in the background.
>>> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/temp/CH%20Ling%20flower>
>>> This is his original
>>> <http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2166.JPG>
>>>
>>> Chuck Norcutt
>>>
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
