It is good to know you both don't mind this issue, I agree it is not too bad
but I have another macro lens that do better in this area so I can choose it
for that purpose. Actually almost every lens has its weak point, that's why
I need 28 different zuikos to suit every of my needs :-)
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Barker" <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Olympus Camera Discussion" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, May 07, 2009 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] That's Not a Bokeh, This is a Bokeh
>I agree, Dawid. I can't see what the problem is.
>
> Perhaps, the out-of-focus colours might be a little more softly
> defined, but I like both those shots and Chuck's "refinement".
>
> Chris
>
> On 7 May 2009, at 07:31, Dawid Loubser wrote:
>
>> In my opinion, even on your two shots, the 90/2.0 renders the
>> background beautifully
>> soft: you have brightly-lit, hard-edged flowers in the background,
>> most lenses would
>> render this scene much more harshly.
>>
>> C.H.Ling wrote:
>>> Sorry to break yours and many people's dream, I found the bokeh
>>> problem of
>>> 90/2 for quite some time but was too lazy to do a more systematic
>>> test with
>>> the FF sensor. Anyway here are two shots I took with the 90/2 (most
>>> likely
>>> at F2.8 or F4), you will see what I mean:
>>>
>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2164.JPG
>>>
>>> http://www.accura.com.hk/temp/IMG_2166.JPG
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|
