Subject: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR |
---|---|
From: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:46:57 -0500 |
Perhaps not too long a wait for a better choice. The lens roadmap for 2009 lists a 14-140 f4-5.6 OIS, a 7-14 F4 and a 20mm F1.7 Mike This looks like a good replacement for my Mynolta A1. With lens and battery, size and weight between the two are nearly identical. The difference is that the A1's lens covers 28-200 equivalent and the G1's 14-45 covers 28-90 equivalent. You'd need something like a 35-100 to complete the picture. But I should think it would be easier to produce a superzoom for this camera with no concerns about retrofocus design. If Tamron can make an 18-250 (28-400) lens for an APS-C camera why not a 9-125 (18-250) for micro 4/3? Chuck Norcutt -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Strange LeicaPany 14-50 pricing?, Richard Man |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] A surfeit of Chrome, Bob Whitmire |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |