Subject: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:57:35 -0800 |
Wayne Harridge wrote: >> Moose <> wrote: >> >> For those who believe it's all about the image, the BIG news and surprise is >> how it stomps the E-520 in detail resolution and clarity - at all ISOs - >> using the exact same len > > "detail resolution" - I presume they mean spatial resolution rather than > temporal resolution ! > > "clarity" - I have no idea what they mean. > Don't blame DPR. Those were my attempts to find words to apply to what I see. Take a look at the pixel level samples of G1 vs. E520. You may not have the same sense I do, but should find it clear enough that the G1 resolves more detail. <http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmcg1/page28.asp> Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] A surfeit of Chrome, Piers Hemy |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR, Wayne Harridge |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR, usher99 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |