A Pen-F -> m4/3 adapter would be nice?
Frank
2009/1/21 Moose
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > Where are the dramatic new lens designs to take advantage of the fact
> that retrofocus design is no longer required?
> >
>
> I think there is a need for, if not full telecentricity, at least a
> fairly large rear element not too close to the sensor, to keep the angle
> of incidence of light from being at to acute an angle.
>
> The first two lenses, at least, are quite compact compared to their
> standard 4/3 counterparts. If you look at the difference between the
> studio shots on DPR taken with the 50/2 and those taken with the kit
> lens, it's clear some higher quality lenses would be rewarded by the
> good sensor. I see the 14-140 lens for 2009 is labeled 'HD'.
> Unfortunately, I suspect that's to designate compatibility for zooming
> during HD video filming with the HD version of the camera, rather than
> some sort of higher quality optic.
>
> A collapsing prime lens should be possible with some clever electrical
> contact design. That would bring true pocket-ability for the street
> shooter.
>
> With the 4/3 lens adapter at $140, I wonder when the direct OM=>m4/3
> manual adapter will show up?
>
> Moose
> --
> _________________________________________________________________
> Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
> Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
> Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
>
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|