Re: [OM] G1 review on DPR

[Ken Norton]

>
> This looks like a good replacement for my Mynolta A1.  With lens and
> battery, size and weight between the two are nearly identical.  The
> difference is that the A1's lens covers 28-200 equivalent and the G1's
> 14-45 covers 28-90 equivalent.  You'd need something like a 35-100 to
> complete the picture.  But I should think it would be easier to produce
> a superzoom for this camera with no concerns about retrofocus design.
> If Tamron can make an 18-250 (28-400) lens for an APS-C camera why not a
> 9-125 (18-250) for micro 4/3?
>


Great minds think alike.  I too have been thinking about the possibilities
of an A1 replacement. But since I'm not in any hurry, I'll gladly wait to
see what Olympus has to offer.  I prefer to stick with one brand if at all
possible because the in-camera image-processing tends to be a bit closer.

AG
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/