Michael,
I would say that it is close when stopped down (f8 or so) but would
still give the edge to the 85/2. While the 35-70 is still quite good
wide open, the 85 at f4 has better edge/corner sharpness.
Jim
Michael Wong wrote:
> Jim,
> I have 35/2, 50/1.2, I think the quality of them are excellent. How's
> the quality of image of 35-70/3.5-4.5? Is it as good as 85/2?
>
>
> ---
> Michael
> Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
>
>
>
> 在 20 Jan 2007 2:34 AM 時，Jim Couch 寫到：
>
>
>> Actually, if Michael is looking for a lightweight lens for
>> backpacking/hiking, and can live with a bit slower & shorter lens
>> at the
>> long end the 35-70 3.5-4.5 is a great alternative - fairly readily
>> available, very lightweight, and has a close focusing mode. (Olympus
>> optimistically calls it Macro.) The 35-80, while a fine lens, is a bit
>> of a tank!
>>
>> Jim
>>
>> Walt Wayman wrote:
>>
>>> An alternative might be the 35-80/2.8, but the chances of getting
>>> one of those is just about nill. I'm thinking about locking mine
>>> up in the safe. :-)
>>>
>>> Walt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> ==============================================
>> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>> ==============================================
>>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|