just curious if they have any optical difference between 100/2.8 E version
versus the E silver nose version ?
-kem
On 1/19/07, Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> And Jaap Korten has one on the auction site as we speak 140074306994 with
> a
> BIN of just USD81 - and it's a silvernose, S/N 105xxx, which might be a
> shade before your magic number, AG. But for that money, it ought to be
> worth the risk.
>
> --
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:olympus-owner@xxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
> Of AG Schnozz
> Sent: 19 January 2007 17:55
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [OM] Re: Zuiko 85mm F2 MC
>
>
> --snip
>
> As to the 85/2, I haven't read the entire thread, but I think the ultimate
> bargain lens that provides the best price/performance ratio in the entire
> line is the 100/2.8. The 85/2 and 100/2.8 are essentially the same
> identical lenses with almost identical bokeh and sharpness
> characteristics.
> The 85/2 quite possibly has the edge in some circumstances, but the
> 100/2.8
> is the real sleeper lens. It is THE lens that keeps me in Olympus. Oh,
> and
> it sings on the E-1.
>
> AG
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
--
when you were born, a problem was solved
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|