Rob,
Thanks for your advice ^^
---
Michael
Palm, Linux, Olympus, Mac user
At 20 Jan 2007 12:35 PM ，Rob Harrison wrote：
> I'd second the choice of 35-70 f3.5-4.5. I took my first one and my
> OM-1md
> as my entire kit on my first trip to Australia in '87-88. I'm still
> amazed
> at the quality of the slides.
>
> And if you can get one from Bill, snap it up. :-)
>
> Rob in Seattle
>
>
> On 1/19/07 3:05 PM, "NSURIT@xxxxxxx" <NSURIT@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> In a message dated 1/19/2007 12:34:52 PM Central Standard Time,
>> zuikoholic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> Actually, if Michael is looking for a lightweight lens for
>> backpacking/hiking, and can live with a bit slower & shorter lens
>> at the
>> long end the 35-70 3.5-4.5 is a great alternative - fairly readily
>> available,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Psst - off list, please. I have one (or two). <[8^) Bill Barber
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|