Subject: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? |
---|---|
From: | Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 2 May 2003 07:04:38 +0100 |
Yes, the bokeh is attractive to me as well Skip. The image has some
dust on it though (just in case you had not noticed... ;-))
Chris On Friday, May 2, 2003, at 03:41 Europe/London, Skip Williams wrote: The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring. Was it sharpened?To my eyes, this is good bokeh: http://www.skipwilliams.adahost.com/data/grass-tamron-80-200- 600fram.jpgSkip <|_:-)_|> C M I Barker Cambridgeshire, Great Britain. +44 (0)7092 251126 mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.threeshoes.co.uk http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko ... a nascent photo library. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Now Hummingbirds (was F280 FP ), Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Chris Barker |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Skip Williams |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |