Yes it is nice but you cannot use it to judge the lens has good bokeh
or not, because the out of focus is much more then the shot Gary
shown. In your case I guarantee all lenses can produce this kind of
bokeh.
C.H.Ling
Skip Williams wrote:
>
> The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring. Was it
> sharpened?
>
> To my eyes, this is good bokeh:
> http://www.skipwilliams.adahost.com/data/grass-tamron-80-200-600fram.jpg
>
> Skip
>
> ----------------------------------------
> Please reply to skipwilliams at pobox.com
> I might not notice personal emails to this address
> ----------------------------------------
>
> >
> >Subject: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?
> > From: "Gary L. Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:10:13 -0500
> > To: "Olympus List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >You tell me. I never have figured out what is good and what is bad. But
> >this one certainly HAS bokah.
> >
> >http://www.peopleplacesflight.com/indianpaintbrush.htm
> >
> >
> >Gary Edwards
> >
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email
Security System. For more information on a proactive email security
service working around the clock, around the globe, visit
http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
