Subject: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? |
---|---|
From: | Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 1 May 2003 21:41:50 -0500 |
The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring. Was it sharpened? To my eyes, this is good bokeh: http://www.skipwilliams.adahost.com/data/grass-tamron-80-200-600fram.jpg Skip ---------------------------------------- Please reply to skipwilliams at pobox.com I might not notice personal emails to this address ---------------------------------------- > >Subject: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? > From: "Gary L. Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thu, 1 May 2003 19:10:13 -0500 > To: "Olympus List" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >You tell me. I never have figured out what is good and what is bad. But >this one certainly HAS bokah. > >http://www.peopleplacesflight.com/indianpaintbrush.htm > > >Gary Edwards > >www.peopleplacesflight.com > > >< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > >< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, C.H.Ling |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, C.H.Ling |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Gareth.J.Martin |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, C.H.Ling |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |