| Subject: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? |
|---|---|
| From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 01 May 2003 20:45:15 -0700 |
Yes, first rate bokeh. Another plus for that lens. Moose Skip Williams wrote: The flower is nice, but the background bokeh is pretty jarring. Was it sharpened? To my eyes, this is good bokeh: http://www.skipwilliams.adahost.com/data/grass-tamron-80-200-600fram.jpg < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Use of the light box bent over?, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OM-4 wish list, Moose |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Joel Wilcox |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Chris Barker |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
