Subject: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? |
---|---|
From: | "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 02 May 2003 09:29:22 +0800 |
To me the bokeh is not really that good on this shot. C.H.Ling "Gary L. Edwards" wrote: > > You tell me. I never have figured out what is good and what is bad. But > this one certainly HAS bokah. > > http://www.peopleplacesflight.com/indianpaintbrush.htm > > Gary Edwards > > www.peopleplacesflight.com > ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________ < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | OT: Washing machines (was: OT: [OM] which metz flash ?), VS |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Skip Williams |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Chris Barker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |