Subject: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah? |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 01 May 2003 20:53:36 -0700 |
Even with a less than ideal background, the very smooth bokeh makes it
rather unobtrusive.
I just took some shots of a very silmilar iris except the upper petals curve up to form a sort of tent over the center. If I got the light right, I hope to have some images of the interior. I've been playing with my new 135/4.5. First tests indicate a rather smooth bokeh. Maybe you will become to bokeh what Gary Reese is to resolution and contrast. Moose C.H.Ling wrote: Sharpening usually will NOT affect the bokeh, unless you do it extremely too much but I never seen one. Below is a closer example of better bokeh lens (Zuiko 75-150), I mean lens character not necessary good choose of background as this one is not good at all:http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/dc/IMG_1283.jpgA poor bokeh lens will make the background details look like seeing through an astigmatic eye, I have shown some examples of good bokeh lens (35-70/3.6) and bad one (Zuiko 50/1.2) before. Now with the Canon 10D I can make a fast comparison of all Zuiko I have, I will do it for the 50mm lens first (but unfortunately I have sold the 50/1.2), stay tuned. < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT copyright question, Moose |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Now Hummingbirds (was F280 FP ), Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, C.H.Ling |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Good bokah, bad bokah?, Joel Wilcox |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |