Subject: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2 |
---|---|
From: | "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:25:05 -0500 |
The repeated phase in my previous post is an Outlook error - not a point of emphasis. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx> > None of those possibilities will be better than no filter at all. Thomas is > right. Thomas is right. > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2, Gary Edwards |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Fang of the Millenium!, DAVDOU9211 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2, Gary Edwards |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2, Thomas Bryhn |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |