Subject: | RE: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2 |
---|---|
From: | Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 12 Oct 2001 07:17:34 -0700 |
I don't know, but if I were you I'd go study the results of Gary's tests
before I decided for sure on which 21mm I wanted.
Tris Hi Tom, > As for flare, I haven't found it to really be a problem with any of the > three. Let's face it, shoot into the sun with a super-wide and you'll get > flare. Will the SC version flare more? Probably, but the differences are > pretty small. Thanks for your reply! On a related note: do you guys think the difference between 21mm and 24mm is big enough to desire a 21/3.5, given the fact that I already have a 24/2.8? This is what has been bugging me for quite some time, and this is the major reason why I'd really like to get the F2 variant, as that will give me both a wider angle, as well as a one stop faster lens.... Any thoughts on this? Cheers! Olafo < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] No help from list members, Garth Wood |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] [OT] Financial condition of Polaroid, Tris Schuler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2, Jim Couch |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2, Tom Scales |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |