Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2

Subject: Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2
From: "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 17:40:05 -0500
Let me revise my message - it was a silvernose 21 that Tom owned at the time
(late March).  My own 21/3.5 black-nose MC was on the camera loaded with HIE
that failed to fire.

Gary

----- Original Message -----
From: <ll.clark@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 3:56 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] 21/3.5 SC vs 21/3.5 MC vs 21/2


> In <005301c15321$df275e90$119efe18@c355520a>, on 10/12/01 at 08:29 AM,
>    "Gary Edwards" <garyetx@xxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >That particular lens made this image while on loan to me:
> >http://members.home.net/garyetx/dt8.htm
> >Gary Edwards
>
> That's probably the one I got!
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
> ---------------------------------------------
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz