In a message dated 99-04-22 05:23:56 EDT, you write:
<< 50-250 does outperform 65-200 at 180-200mm. Nevertheless, I confess that
65-200 is a very surprising and exceptional lens, which is usually
underrated.
I have both 65-200 and 50-250, the same size, similar weight, both
extremely good performers. But, I just cannot part with any of them...
Nor can I with the 70-210/2.8-4 Ser1 Vivitar. Vivitar is fast, 65-200
*is* really better and slower, and 50-250 is the best, and slowest.
Am I nuts??
OMer (Uh-huuh!.. the name explains it all...) >>
I am quite ill; I can't part with anything at all but I may be forced to for
space reasons. Anyway, does anyone have any experience with the Tamron
180/2.5 as compared to Zuikos in the 180-200 range? As I recall it did well
in Modern Photo tests.
Warren Kato
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|