Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4

Subject: Re: [OM] 200mm F4 / F5 vs. 65/200mm F4
From: Joel Wilcox <jowilcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 1999 08:11:16 -0500
At 10:43 AM 4/22/99 +0200, you wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 PCACala@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>I have both 65-200 and 50-250, the same size, similar weight, both 
>extremely good performers. But, I just cannot part with any of them...
>Nor can I with the 70-210/2.8-4 Ser1 Vivitar. Vivitar is fast, 65-200 
>*is* really better and slower, and 50-250 is the best, and slowest.
>
>Am I nuts??
>
>OMer (Uh-huuh!.. the name explains it all...)
>
>

Hi Omer,

Yes, you are nuts. When a Zuik asks a question like that, other Zuiks must
be supportive.

Take a 90/f2 and write us in the morning.

Wishing I were as nuts as you,

Joel

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz