Sensor and layers before it are one unit, as far as I picked up. It makes
sense, think about the dust problem you would have otherwise, between
sensor and those layers.
The thicker the glass, the sooner it gets in the depth of field, so from an
intuitive point of view (m)43 would have a double disadvantage because of
the shorter equivalent focal length that come with bigger depth of field as
well. So I'd think the superior ultrasonic cleaning system contributes more
to the difference between Oly and Canon...
Op do 19 dec. 2019 om 16:54 schreef Wayne Shumaker
> Slightly related, I remember commenting in the past on the sensor glass
> thickness as also accounting for a diminished effect of dust on the sensor
> of the Olys vs the canons.
>
> I assume that this glass does not move with IBIS? or does it?
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|