Subject: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200 |
---|---|
From: | Mike Gordon via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 17 Dec 2019 22:27:54 +0000 (UTC) |
Cc: | usher99@xxxxxxx |
<<<<<MikeG may weigh in on the issue of sensor stack thickness. It's a real consideration for old MF lenses. Sensor stack: The glass in front of the sensor--UV filters etc. WA RF lenses with short exit pupil distances at wide apertures are very degraded in corners. It is clear even some WA SLR lenses can be effected at FL <35mm. Other lenses seem fine. If one obtains the exactly correct PCX filter, it can correct the corner smearing and maintain infinity focus. Another way is to get the Sonnie cam modified by Kolari if committed to use such lenses but have to be prepared for more complex work flow with color issues. I do not know the sensor stack thickness on the new FF Panny. Roger had 3 good articles on sensor stack effects: https://wordpress.lensrentals.com/blog/2014/06/the-glass-in-the-path-sensor-stacks-and-adapted-lenses/ https://wordpress.lensrentals.com/blog/2014/06/sensor-stack-thickness-when-does-it-matter/ https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/2014/07/sensor-stack-thickness-part-iii-the-summary/ Curiously the proper Speedbooster will correct for the sensor stack, but that is not a solution for FF. Adaptable, Mike -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Bbbbbrrrrrrr Cold!, Charles Geilfuss |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Bbbbbrrrrrrr Cold!, Wayne Harridge |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200, Mike Gordon via olympus |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200, Wayne Shumaker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |