Subject: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200 |
---|---|
From: | Frank <wijsmuller@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Dec 2019 20:23:52 +0100 |
Hmm... 1:3 feels unusual conservative for you Nathan ;-). My 12-100 proves to me that 8x at least optically hardly involves optical sacrifice (on cropped sensors ;-). There is still the weight penalty of course. Op ma 16 dec. 2019 om 06:33 schreef Nathan Wajsman > I think this is typical for a lens with this zoom range. There is no free > lunch. > I avoid zooms with a ratio of more than 1:3 between the short and the long > end. > > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] The Corner Office., Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200, Moose |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] another one with the 12-200, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |