Yes! Sirens would do the trick of luring them closer, particularly when you
consider the wide angle of view of the cameras (unless it’s one with a zoom
;-)).
I can imagine that the aerial view gives a better understanding of how the land
lies for digs etc . . . .
Chris
> On 3 Dec 18, at 01:56, JOHN DUGGAN via olympus <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> Chris regarding drones and the shooting thereof....Probably best to use a 12
> g Magnum or 10 bore with swan shot. To make it easier lure them into range
> with naked maidens dancing .On a more serious note our archaeological Society
> finds them very useful for surveys of our sites, giving us a good overview
> prior to digging, especially in difficult terrain.
> Regards John Duggan, Wales, UK
>
> On Sunday, 2 December 2018, 21:48:31 GMT, ChrisB <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> That’s not good! There’s no excuse for disrupting anything/one.
>
> Chris
>
> C M I Barker | Gamlingay
>
>
> On 2 Dec 2018, at 21:35, Mike Lazzari <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> But it would be illegal, I reckon :-)
>>
>> I think that there would be a strong "temporary insanity" defense. ;)
>>
>>
>> FWIW they are illegal in parks and other such public places as well as the
>> no-fly zone around air fields. They are very disruptive to wildlife and I've
>> politely pointed that out several times to people flying drones at a local
>> state park. Most were unaware of the rules (signs posted) and the disruption
>> and promptly landed.Only one person was a jerk about it. He was totally
>> oblivious to the active eagles/ nest he was buzzing.
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|