Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars

Subject: Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars
From: Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 5 Apr 2012 20:48:02 +1000
How dare you!  :-)
Only DPReview is powerful enough to really give them a serve - remember the 
fuss with Sony early in the NEX?
That said, they often miss things I consider important.
Consumer magazines are worse tan hopeless - camera, washing machine, it's all 
the same to them and their reviews are often risibly unintelligent.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com



On 05/04/2012, at 4:19 PM, Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Actually, I never trust reviews in magazines, whether we are talking cameras, 
> bicycles or anything else. I read them for information about features of 
> products I am interested in, but for the real assessment you have to read 
> between the lines. The reason is simple: most enthusiast  magazines are 
> financed by advertising, and nobody is going to bite the hand the feeds them. 
> When I lived in the US, I relied on Consumer Reports which accepts no 
> advertising, but of course it is a generalist magazine, so to an enthusiast 
> its reviews of the products one is enthusiastic about will usually sound 
> superficial--because they are written from the point of view of a general 
> user.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz