ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars

Subject:	Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars
From:	Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:10:44 +1000

And the magazine, newspaper or website has to sell space to the manufacturer. 
it's a tricky balance. 
The manufacturer would prefer that we simply rewrote the press release and I've 
seen a lot do that with the X-Pro.
Learn to read between the lines - that's the best I can advise.
Andrew Fildes
afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.soultheft.com



On 05/04/2012, at 4:37 AM, Chris Barker wrote:

> The viewers or readers have to be able to trust the reviewer.

-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, (continued) Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Piers Hemy Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes <= Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Wayne Harridge Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chuck Norcutt

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Ken Norton
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Piers Hemy
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Chris Barker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]