Subject: | Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars |
---|---|
From: | "Piers Hemy" <piers@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 5 Apr 2012 09:23:45 +0100 |
Well you didn't add any riders to that comment, so I won't to my response. Nonsense! Piers -----Original Message----- From: Ken Norton [mailto:ken@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 04 April 2012 19:55 To: Olympus Camera Discussion Subject: Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars --snip Oh, one glaring exception with Olympus. The E-5 won't run tethered. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Nathan Wajsman |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Return of the Moose - Visual Conundrum 8, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Andrews review of the X-Pro-1, was cars, Andrew Fildes |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |