Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:00:24 -0500 |
What was the reason for two applications... other than the first one wasn't enough? On 11/21/2011 3:25 PM, Moose wrote: > On 11/20/2011 5:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: >> I understand all of this except for the role of Focus Magic. But I >> don't recall the image well enough to know if it needed focus help. > > Oh yeah, it sure did. The original is there in the roll-over. > <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Trask/Queen_Butterfly_2.htm> > > More FM than I would normally use, but the original is very soft. > <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Trask/Queen_Butterfly_2.htm> > Moose -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Comparing 50 mm lenses, Wayne Harridge |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Trip fever, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly, Moose |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |