Subject: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly |
---|---|
From: | Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 12:25:38 -0800 |
On 11/20/2011 5:17 AM, Chuck Norcutt wrote: > I understand all of this except for the role of Focus Magic. But I > don't recall the image well enough to know if it needed focus help. Oh yeah, it sure did. The original is there in the roll-over. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Trask/Queen_Butterfly_2.htm> More FM than I would normally use, but the original is very soft. <http://www.moosemystic.net/Gallery/Others/Trask/Queen_Butterfly_2.htm> Moose -- What if the Hokey Pokey *IS* what it's all about? -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] IMG: An Unusual Airplane, Jim Nichols |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Comparing 50 mm lenses, Andrew Fildes |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] IMG: Thursday Butterfly, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |