ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

Subject:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7
From:	"George Themelis" <george@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:04:47 -0500

> The question is, what *couldn't* you use as subjects, with this lens?

Yes, that's a good way of putting it.

George
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Sandy Harris Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Carlos J. Santisteban [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis <= Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, manuel viet Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, bill pearce Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Bob Whitmire
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Use of verbs, Bob Whitmire
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Bob Whitmire
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]