| Subject: | Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7 |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Fildes <afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Feb 2011 09:06:54 +1100 |
It's good but not in the same class as the 20mm. Andrew Fildes afildes@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On 01/02/2011, at 11:38 PM, Carlos J. Santisteban wrote: > Sure it is... but Panny has just released a really tiny 14/2.5! -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] E-3 problems, Wiliam Wagenaar |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] OT: Use of verbs, was Re: olympus Digest, Vol 27, Issue 31, Marc Lawrence |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |