ML Archiv: Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7

Subject:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7
From:	"Brian Swale" <bj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 03 Feb 2011 01:11:29 +1300

Hi all,

Having read all the comments about this lens, I find myself wondering what 
photographic subject(s) would cause somebody to so exclusively use a 
20mm lens?

What are your typical subjects with this lens?
(Don't all rush at once ! ) 

Brian Swale. 
-- 
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Sandy Harris Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Nathan Wajsman Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Carlos J. Santisteban [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] PanaLeica 25/1.4, Was: Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Brian Swale <= Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Bob Whitmire Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Ken Norton Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, George Themelis Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, manuel viet Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Chuck Norcutt Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, bill pearce

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] (OT) (OM) Use of verbs etc, Brian Swale
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] (OM) Energy (was Re: Changes on the Zone-10 Front), Brian Swale
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Andrew Fildes
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] Panny 20/1.7, Dawid Loubser
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]