Thanks, Ian, for that generous offer. But I didn't realise how much more
compact was the later version. I had thought that it was just a difference in
speed.
Since it is compactness that I need, I had better buy one of those. I
recognise that the image quality will be down a bit, but since I have the
50-200 to use when I need quality over portability, that's not a problem.
Cheers
Chris
On 2 Feb 2010, at 19:06, Ian Nichols wrote:
>
> I'm thinking of selling on my 40-150, now that I have the 50-200. It
> would still be a better partner for my E-330 second body, but I mostly
> use that with the 35 macro for shooting static subjects. Given the
> remarkably low price they seem to be going for on ebay at the moment,
> I haven't been very enthusiastic about making the effort to list it.
>
> To a list member, I'll let it go for UKP60 plus postage. It's a mark
> 1 version, and I don't have the original box. Glass is fine & all the
> moving bits move properly.
>
> Not sure how tempted you should be by this:
> http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Olympus-40-150-4-5-6-II-4-3-fit-UNBOXED-2-YEAR-GTEE_W0QQitemZ190368363680
>
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|