On 2 February 2010 18:48, Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dear All
>
> I'm looking for a 40-150 (f3.5 one, i think) or a 70-300 (depending on the
> price). I have decided that it is probably time to go a little lighter with
> my kit.
> But is anyone about to get rid of one or the other?
I'm thinking of selling on my 40-150, now that I have the 50-200. It
would still be a better partner for my E-330 second body, but I mostly
use that with the 35 macro for shooting static subjects. Given the
remarkably low price they seem to be going for on ebay at the moment,
I haven't been very enthusiastic about making the effort to list it.
To a list member, I'll let it go for UKP60 plus postage. It's a mark
1 version, and I don't have the original box. Glass is fine & all the
moving bits move properly.
Not sure how tempted you should be by this:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/Olympus-40-150-4-5-6-II-4-3-fit-UNBOXED-2-YEAR-GTEE_W0QQitemZ190368363680
--
Stand firm for what you believe in, until and unless logic and experience
prove you wrong. Remember: when the emperor looks naked, the emperor *is*
naked, the truth and a lie are not "sort-of the same thing" and there is
no aspect, no facet, no moment of life that can't be improved with pizza.
-Daria Morgendorffer
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|