Thanks, Joel. I wasn't sure if anyone on the List used the 40-150 much,
although I remember a thread about the relative apertures a few months ago.
I do like the Autumn shots, and one that stands out is the moored boat and the
river bank with the trees ...
Chris
On 3 Feb 2010, at 04:35, Joel Wilcox wrote:
>> Since it is compactness that I need, I had better buy one of those. I
>> recognise that the image quality will be down a bit, but since I have the
>> 50-200 to use when I need quality over portability, that's not a problem.
>
> Chris,
> Most of the tele shots in this gallery were made with the later 40-150:
>
> http://jfwilcox.jalbum.net/Fall2009/index.html
>
> Even I can't be entirely sure which of the kit lenses (e-410) I used
> in several cases, but any of the shots of trees with colored leaves
> would have been with the 40-150. I like that lens a lot. It's the
> difference of a 2.8 Zuiko to a 2, when compared to the 50-200 IMO.
>
> Joel W.
--
_________________________________________________________________
Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus
Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/
Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/
|