Subject: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jun 2009 15:54:39 -0400 |
Certainly... for a single shot done manually at a range within the angular coverage of the flash. But the exposure was done with multiple flashes in flash auto mode... which, even ignoring possible overlapping flashes, with be attempting to turn the black train into a middle gray one. Chuck Norcutt Ken Norton wrote: >> And how did you determine the number of flashes to be used? Especially >> since you were photographing a black object. >> > > Wouldn't the laws of "flash to subject distance" still apply? It may be a > black object, but like most black objects, reflect a lot of light. > > AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Speaking of Trains, Chuck Norcutt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road, Chuck Norcutt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Ken Norton |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Carlos J. Santisteban |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |