Subject: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Fri, 05 Jun 2009 20:24:27 -0400 |
How about dragging the shutter with manual flash. Can be done with any camera with a cheap manual flash. Dr. Flash usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > So, I trust you have it on a pod to avoid ghost images at 1/15? > Another advantage of the plain 2 system is one can paint with multiple > flashes > until proper exposure is reached---John--you there? Time to link one > of your super nice train shots using that technique. > > AG keeps rubbing it in that he is one of the few list members that can > drag the shutter with TTL flash-- harumph. ;-) > > Mike > > > Why not forgo auto exposure and just use manual exposure you ask? > Because > if the flash does not fire, the auto-exposure will compensate and will > still > properly expose the image. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, usher99 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Oily 300/4.5. Suggestions?, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, usher99 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Wayne Harridge |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |