Subject: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty |
---|---|
From: | Ken Norton <ken@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 8 Jun 2009 14:20:16 -0500 |
> > And how did you determine the number of flashes to be used? Especially > since you were photographing a black object. > Wouldn't the laws of "flash to subject distance" still apply? It may be a black object, but like most black objects, reflect a lot of light. AG -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Speaking of Trains, Ken Norton |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Image Storage on the Road, John Hermanson |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |