Subject: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty |
---|---|
From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jun 2009 22:08:06 -0400 |
That's what I was waiting for... the compensation. Dr. Flash usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > I remember trying this once or twice. I'll defer to John as his images > were much more compelling and will also await Dr. Flash's comments. > The advantage of the camera in auto is that it accumulates the > flash/ambient until proper exposure is met. I think I set it so there > was a several second--?5-8 exposure AND have the camera exp > compensation set to adjust for the tonality of the subject. Set the > flash say 3 stops down on auto or the equivalent manual setting and > paint the desired areas with the flash until the camera closes the > shutter. > voilà, (perhaps) I think I only tried it with print film to provide > more latitude for errors. > Mike > > > Certainly... for a single shot done manually at a range within the > angular coverage of the flash. But the exposure was done with multiple > flashes in flash auto mode... which, even ignoring possible overlapping > flashes, with be attempting to turn the black train into a middle gray > one. > > Chuck Norcutt > > -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] More on London Gathering ..., Nicolas Mitchell |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Ken Norton |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Ken Norton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |