Subject: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty |
---|---|
From: | Fernando Gonzalez Gentile <fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:55:08 -0300 |
Could you guess what I'm remembering at this very moment ? :-) That when I joined this list I firmly advocated that the OM 2 should not have had been modified regarding Auto mode and flash exposure. Carlos Santisteban did on the contrary, and so did John IIRC. I got convinced after the azaleas' photographs (Chuck might remember them) - I made same shots with the plain 2 and the 2n, and the 2n's (mostly some of them I never scanned), came with the background perfectly black and the flowers perfectly Velvia red. OTOH, my entry TOPE on <http://www.tope.nl/tope_show_entry.php?event=23&pic=4> couldn't have been done with a 2n. That's why I have all but the PBG2 shoe taped at the right .... :-) Frnando. usher99@xxxxxxx wrote: > I remember trying this once or twice. -- _________________________________________________________________ Options: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/listinfo/olympus Archives: http://lists.thomasclausen.net/mailman/private/olympus/ Themed Olympus Photo Exhibition: http://www.tope.nl/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] OT - For those who remember Polaroid, Christopher L. Tabby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] More on London Gathering ..., Nicolas Mitchell |
Previous by Thread: | [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, usher99 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] TTL flash theory, was: An object of beauty, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |